Skip to main content

2013 Ford Focus ST Lap Times - A Closer Look




A few weeks ago, Car and Driver posted their annual new and updated performance cars test - Lightning Lap 2013 (Car and Driver's Lightning Lap 2013 - A Closer Look). While the Focus ST has yet to disappoint a reviewer in terms of driving balance and handling, especially for a front-wheel drive, performance numbers and lap times were a little lower than expected.

The Lightning Lap is held at Virginia International Raceway (VIR), where the Focus ST posted a lap time of 3:21.4. In case you are not familiar with the track and the lap times, this time puts it behind competitors like the Golf GTI MkVI, the Subaru BRZ, the Mini Cooper John Cooper Works, the Subaru Impreza WRX and the Mazda Mazdaspeed 3. One thing to note, though, is that it wasn't all smooth sailing for the Focus ST during Lightning Lap 2013.

The Lightning Lap test is simple in that cars are ranked based only on their lap times over 3 days of tests. They usually record the fastest lap times on the second day, which makes sense because they wouldn't be as familiar with the car on day 1 and exhaustion probably hinders progress on day 3.  In an unfortunate incident (for the Focus) the keys were smashed and the car was forced to miss the second day of lapping, which means it possibly missed its chance to record the fastest lap time. A recent Motor Trend comparison test may have just redeemed the Focus ST's numbers though.

Motor Trend posted a comparison test between the 2013 Mazda Mazdaspeed3, Ford Focus ST and Subaru Impreza WRX Special Edition a couple of weeks ago. The comparison included hot lapping the 3 cars at the 1.55 mile Streets of Willow Raceway where they ranked third, second and first:

1 - Impreza WRX: 1:27.40
2 - Focus ST: 1:28.40
3 - Mazdaspeed3: 1:29.51

While at VIR with Car and Driver the rankings were different:

1 - Mazdaspeed3: 3:16.2
2 - Impreza WRX: 3:16.5
3 - Focus ST: 3:21.4

You can't always carry the same lap-time-based order/ranking from track to track. This is clear here where the Mazdaspeed3 is a couple of seconds slower than the WRX at Streets of Willow but 0.3 s quicker at VIR. However, during the Motor Trend test, the 3 cars were closely matched and the same stands at VIR, except for the Focus ST which is far behind. It's not unusual for a car's performance to vary a lot from track to track, though, because different track configurations highlight different strengths and weaknesses.

So what are the Focus ST's weaknesses compared to the WRX and Mazdaspeed3? We know from reviews that it's the best handler, objectively and subjectively. It is the most neutral with the best turn in and posts class leading grip and braking numbers. The only category where the Focus ST trails is acceleration. Add that to the fact that it lacks a mechanical limited slip diff, which is something it's always critiqued for, and it's apparent that what the Focus ST needs to post better numbers is one thing; Speed.

The question is, does it have enough speed to post a faster lap time than the 3:21.4? The answer, in my opinion, is a definite yes. The VW Golf GTI Mk VI, a direct competitor for the Focus ST, posted a lap time of 3:19.3 at VIR when it was tested for Lightning Lap 2009. The Golf GTI has less hp and torque - 52 hp and 63 lb-ft torque to be exact. The Focus has stronger brakes, more grip and a more composed chassis (in terms of performance). The Golf GTI even has to do with an electronic brake-based limited slip diff, much like the Focus ST. In terms of performance, the GTI should have no advantage over the Focus ST.

So what do I make out of this? The Focus ST should be able to at least post a better lap time than 3:19.3 and probably closer to the 3:16.x range. There's no way to tell for sure, though, so I hope Car and Driver brings the Focus ST back next year for another round of testing.. Now enough with all that bench racing - if you have a Focus ST, you know it's a pretty quick car and should be able to hang with the best in class so take it out to a track or an autocross event and see how fast you can take it!

Source: Car and Driver and Motor Trend

Popular posts from this blog

2020 Mid-engine Corvette C8 - What You Need to Know

Rumours of a mid-engine Corvette have been around basically since the C2 Corvette, the first Stingray. I've heard some people argue that the Corvette is already mid engine because the engine sits almost entirely behind the front axle, making it mounted midship. But everyone knows that the classic definition of a midengined car is that of an engine mounted between the seats and the rear axle, not the front axle. That's what everyone pictures if you say "mid-engine". Worse still (for the Corvette), a true midengined layout has a lot more traction - all else being equal - than a front-midship mounted engine like the current Corvette, no matter how far back it is mounted. Chevy knows this, and there has been no shortage of Corvette mid-engine concepts for decades. This time, however, it's different.

For one, manufacturers these days tend to keep very special/high performance models under wraps for a very long time during development, only revealing them when they a…

2007 Saleen Mustang S281 SC Super Shaker Track Review

"Who's your green student today?" asked a friend and instructor at the BMW Club Atlantic Advanced Driver Training (HPDE) weekend in June this year. I said: "The Saleen." The response was: "Oh, boy." Mustangs, generally, have a reputation for being more power than chassis. Mustang drivers have quite the reputation for.. how to put this nicely? Taking advantage of said power/chassis imbalance. To make matters worse, this particular Mustang was a supercharged Saleen, with a honkin' Shaker scoop sticking out of its hood. Did I mention it was also a convertible? And the owner was someone who's never been on track before but clearly has the speed bug.

Having had a Mustang for years and driven a few on track, they don't scare me - generally speaking - but the combination of being convertible and supercharged with a new and excited owner worried me a little. Nevertheless, I shrugged it off and got excited about chatting with the owner to find out…

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track loads. Combine that with the fact that I drive a good amount on the street during the summer, and I was very worried that they wouldn't last more than a handful of…

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity.

Grip is noticeably lowe…

2014 BMW 335i xDrive M Sport Review

Post-refresh 2015 F30 3-series pictured. 
Which is better, an F30 3-series or an E46? The F30 has certainly taken its fair share of heat. But if you thought I was going to say the E46, you'd be dead wrong. The F30 3-series is better. Far better. It is quicker, faster, safer, more practical, more efficient, more refined, quieter.. the list goes on. A lot of reviews and people I talk to consider the F30 to be an abomination. Frankly, I don't see it. You'd have to be mad to think the E46 is better. Completely out to lunch. I don't know who in their right mind would prefer the E46..  Trouble is, since when were people buying sports cars in their right minds? Here, lies the real problem.

"Raw rather than refined in its noises, pounding ride, heavy clutch, 50 grand and cloth seats?"
".. and not at all shy about its performance compromises. It always acts like the automotive jock it is, every mile of every day."
"Raw and quite loud.. And sometimes ru…

Ford Focus RS vs Subaru WRX STI vs Mitsubishi Evo X MR

All these cars have one common Achilles' heel. The engines sit entirely ahead of the front axles; a great family recipe for understeer. Then tell the front tires - already taxed from trying to keep that front engine sitting outside the wheelbase from going straight - to put some power down and you can only make matters worse. There are ways to mitigate the understeer with suspension tuning, of course, but the toughest part is power-on understeer. I don't want to get much into tires, but the thing to remember is that because tires have a certain "grip budget" - how much total grip they can hold/generate before they let go - when you get on the power in a car that sends power to the front wheels (FWD or AWD), you will rob some of the precious grip you were relying on to turn the car in order to put all or some power down. You'll run out of front lateral grip sooner than you would have otherwise, as a result. Worse yet, because of the unideal engine pla…