Skip to main content

2014 Cadillac CTS - There's more of everything!




More luxury, more innovation, more power and higher efficiency. The new Cadillac CTS brings a lot to the table. The car used to be slightly smaller than other midsize luxury cars and slightly more expensive than compact luxury cars. This allowed it to compete in two segments but it was a temporary solution until Cadillac has a proper compact entry. The ATS is now comfortably competing in the compact luxury segment. Since its release, it has accomplished as much as becoming the handling benchmark and growing sales every month it has been on sale except for January of this year. The car is now larger and more expensive to more directly compete with midsize luxury offerings like the BMW 5-series and Mercedes Benz E-class.




On the outside, the design is clearly an evolution of the current CTS. The current edgy design has been rounded off a la the ATS. The headlights and fog lights look a lot like those used on the ATS with longitudinal LED's running along the lengths of the housings. Unlike the ATS, the grille is less rounded off - more edgy - and the grille occupies a larger portion of the front fascia, like the current CTS. One thing remains true though - the exterior is stunning!




Once you're in, you're treated to fine materials all around. The interior of the current CTS is hardly lacking but the new one is definitely an upgrade. There will be a choice of 8 interior environments and trim materials include aluminum, wood and carbon fibre - all genuine. All models come standard with 8" high-resolution infotainment screens but a larger, 12.3", high-resolution screen is available as an option.






Cadillac's Cadillac User Experience (CUE) infotainment system is also standard with USB connectivity and SD card ports. The capacitive touch panel that's in the ATS is found inside the CTS as well. Automatic parking assist and 20-way adjustable front seats that are also heated and cooled are available along with a heated steering wheel.




Now getting to the piece de resistance, the CTS will be available with 3 engine options - the 3rd being a powerful twin turbo V6 to bridge the gap that currently exists between the 3.6 litre High Feature V6 and the 6.2 litre LSA V8. The 3.6 High Feature V6 will continue to be offered in the next gen CTS and will be joined by a new base engine - the 2.0 litre 4-cyl turbo that's midrange on the ATS - and the new-for-2014 twin turbo V6. Engine outputs are: 

2.0 Turbo I4             : 272 hp and 295 lb-ft torque
3.6 High Feature V6 : 321 hp and 275 lb-ft torque
3.6 Twin-Turbo V6    : 420 hp and 430 lb-ft torque

As is the case with well designed turbo engines, the turbo 2.0 litre and twin-turbo 3.6 litre have a very wide torque curve. 90% of the torque is available from 1,500 rpm to 5,800 rpm on the turbo 2.0 litre and from 2,500 rpm to 5,500 rpm on the TT 3.6 litre. Power will be routed via an 8-speed automatic (sourced from Aisin - the TL-80SN) transmission on both of the V6 engines with RWD as the drivetrain option. AWD is still available only with a 6-speed automatic. Cadillac is working on its own 8-speed automatic which should debut later in the model's lifecycle and I imagine it would be available with both RWD and AWD configurations. 

The twin-turbo V6 is available only with RWD and, when so equipped, GM estimates a 0-60 mph time in 4.6 seconds and a top speed of 170 mph. These estimates are usually conservative so I wouldn't be surprised if actual 0-60 mph times are in the low 4 second range. GM estimates EPA fuel numbers as follows:

2.0T RWD       : 19 mpg/30 mpg city/hwy
2.0T AWD       : 18 mpg/28 mpg city/hwy
3.6 V6 RWD  : 19 mpg/28 mpg city/hwy
3.6 V6 AWD   : 18 mpg/27 mpg city/hwy
3.6 TT V6        : 17 mpg/25 mpg city/hwy




The engine is about more than just numbers though. The picture shown above displays the complete engine and turbocharging system. Yes, even including the intercooler. GM did an impressive engineering job at packaging the system. The two turbos are tucked behind the alternator and accessory pump on both sides of the engine. 




The charged air intercooler - a twin-brick cooling module - is mounted on top of the cylinder head and is patent pending. It's influenced by the GM's LSA supercharged V8 found in the current CTS-V. The impressive, ultra-compact design, takes out 60% of the compressed air volume out of the plumbing system compared to conventional remote mounted intercoolers. This should greatly reduce turbo lag. The system reduces charge-air temperature by more than 74 °C (130 °F) while adding only 1 psi of restriction at peak power. For more information, visit GM's new twin-turbo V6 boasts BMW-beating output, brilliant packaging.

GM didn't only add power and 2 extra gears, but also took out weight. The new CTS was expected to drop some weight since it is built on the new lightweight GM Alpha RWD chassis underpinning the ATS. GM is claiming it to be a whopping 200 lb. lighter in entry-level form compared to an entry-level BMW 5-series - the 528i, which equates to only 3616 lb.! Rounding off the chassis and suspension is the Magnetic Ride suspension which is now available across the board, as opposed to being reserved only for the top-dog CTS-V.




Overall, the new CTS improves on all aspects of the current car. Considering how much of a success the first 2 generations of the CTS were, from sales and brand imagine perspectives, this will definitely continue to build on the success. I can't wait until I see one in person and get drive one of them! Until then, here's a video that shows it in motion.




Sources: Left Lane, Auto123, and SAE


Comments

  1. The new Cadillac CTS is for sure more luxurious, more innovation, more power and higher efficiency. Very thoughtful design to change it from the normal cadillac.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track loads. Combine that with the fact that I drive a good amount on the street during the summer, and I was very worried that they wouldn't last more than a handful of…

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity.

Grip is noticeably lowe…

Watch The Best Valentine's Day Inspiration: Wife & Husband Track Battle

Wife (R32) vs husband (Mk1 Golf) playing a bit of tag at Atlantic Motorsport Park in Shubie, NS. Both cars are turbocharged, both built by them for them to enjoy on a track. Oh, and the R32 shoots flames on the overrun. Every. Single. Time. This is the best couples bonding activity I've ever seen.



Follow Ram's Eye The Track Guy on Facebook and Instagram!





View this post on Instagram


A post shared by Mike R (@ramseyethetrackguy) on Oct 18, 2018 at 5:03pm PDT

2014 BMW 335i xDrive M Sport Review

Post-refresh 2015 F30 3-series pictured. 
Which is better, an F30 3-series or an E46? The F30 has certainly taken its fair share of heat. But if you thought I was going to say the E46, you'd be dead wrong. The F30 3-series is better. Far better. It is quicker, faster, safer, more practical, more efficient, more refined, quieter.. the list goes on. A lot of reviews and people I talk to consider the F30 to be an abomination. Frankly, I don't see it. You'd have to be mad to think the E46 is better. Completely out to lunch. I don't know who in their right mind would prefer the E46..  Trouble is, since when were people buying sports cars in their right minds? Here, lies the real problem.

"Raw rather than refined in its noises, pounding ride, heavy clutch, 50 grand and cloth seats?"
".. and not at all shy about its performance compromises. It always acts like the automotive jock it is, every mile of every day."
"Raw and quite loud.. And sometimes ru…

Dad's Supercar - A great mid-engine build

I came across this home build on a forum (Cobaltss.net) and thought it was really cool. It's a mid-engine build with an engine out of a Cobalt SS (appears to be an LSJ) with a dry sump oiling system. The goal, according to the page, is to have 450 hp on gas to drive to the strip and switch to methanol, change injectors and tune and run with ~ 1,000 hp.






Rear suspension:


Front suspension:



Check it out the (little) details on the build here: Dad's Home-built mid-engine Supercar


Snow/Ice Rallycross in the Rabbit

FWD cars don't win the WRC anymore and they haven't in decades. In fact, all two wheel drive (2WD) cars have been rendered entirely obsolete on the world stage by the original legendary Audi Quattro. That's because 4 driven wheels are obviously far better at putting power down than just 2 and when you are on a loose surface such as mud, gravel, or snow, traction is in SERIOUS short supply. Thankfully, I'm not on the world rally stage or competing for the world title, so I'm happy with my little FWD rallycross car (for now anyway...).

I have already been to one event this season (which is my first rallycross season) in this car. You can read more about it here where I nearly caught air going over one of the bumps. Last time was on gravel, though. This time, it was a snow covered course and what I didn't know was that snow wasn't covering gravel. It was covering ice. What could possibly go wrong?

In what I seriously fear will turn into a tradition, I once ag…

Contact Me

Name

Email *

Message *