Skip to main content

Challenger SRT10 or SRT8 ACR to go against the Z/28?




Well, it didn't take long for the SRT team to notice the Camaro Z/28 and respond. At the New York Auto Show, SRT boss Ralph Gilles told Motor Trend that SRT will soon have an answer for the Camaro Z/28. Ralph Gilles said that the Barracuda, the car that is supposed to eventually replace the Challenger, is not that far along so the answer will have to be a variant of the Challenger. No details were given so we're left to speculate as to what upgrades the Challenger will get.

There is one possibility.. and that's an SRT10 Challenger. It has been shown that there's room for a V10 under the hood of the Challenger. The 2011 Dodge Challenger V10 Drag Pack takes a Dodge Challenger and stuffs Mopar's 512 cubic-inch (8.4 litre) V10 crate engine along with a 2-speed automatic transmission and suspension, chassis and interior modifications to prep it for drag racing (for more info, visit: V10 Dodge Challenger revealed: 2011 Mopar Challenger V-10 Drag Pak).

An SRT10 Challenger would be great for the brand in my opinion. The Challenger has always been viewed as the more comfortable and convenient pony since the return of the retro muscle cars. It's not necessarily a bad thing. I actually like that comfort and convenience seem to have been put above performance to create a great cruiser. But when it comes to competition or sports car enthusiasts, it's always Camaro vs Mustang out of the 3 ponies because the Challenger isn't as competitive. An SRT10 would differentiate the Challenger further from the rest of the lineup and show the market that they mean business.

Another option would be a Challenger SRT8 ACR (or TA - Time Attack). ACR stands for American Club Racing and Dodge has made several ACR variants in the past of their performance vehicles, namely the Neon SRT4 and the Viper. The first ACR version of the Viper included a horsepower bump of 10 hp but the SRT4 (Neon SRT4) ACR and the last Viper ACR received no increase in power so it could go either way. I have no doubt that a Challenger SRT8 ACR would receive a significant increase in power, though. Other areas of improvement included with the ACR treatment are tires, chassis, suspension, weight and aerodynamics.

Whichever way SRT decides to go, there are a few things that you should fully expect - upgraded tires, brakes, shocks, springs, roll bars and aerodynamics along with a significant hp bump and some chassis stiffening components. I, unfortunately, don't expect to see a Challenger SRT10 but I hope I'm wrong. An alternative to going to a V10 for a lot of extra hp would be to thoroughly rework the 6.4 litre HEMI currently in the SRT8 392 - much like the same way Ford did with the 5.0 Coyote to create the 5.0 Roadrunner they put in the Boss 302. There's a lot of room for extra power in the 6.4 litre HEMI but, in my opinion, it would be much better for the car's image to rework the entire engine.

Another area that's very important (and probably very likely to be addressed) is weight. A new Challenger SRT8 392 comes in at around 4,160 lb. (according to Dodge's website) which is about 300 lb. heavier than what the Z/28 is going to be and about a whopping 500 lb. heavier than the now-out-of-production Boss 302. Although the Boss 302 is significantly slower than the Z/28 is going to be, it will always be some sort of a benchmark since it was the first track-focused focused, high hp N/A muscle car since the retro muscle cars came into production.

Will Ford have an answer too? I don't doubt it. I wouldn't be surprised if Ford waits until the next gen Mustang comes out to have a model to compete with the Z/28. It's hard to say, though, if Ford will bring an extra variant (i.e. Cobra, Mach, etc.) or simply make the GT500 (or whatever model goes above the GT) very, very fast. Regardless of the way Ford goes, it's going to be great and I am VERY looking forward to a three way comparison and seeing what they bring to the table!

As for the Challenger, which would you prefer to see, an SRT8 ACR with significant engine upgrades for the addition power or a Challenger SRT10?

Source: Motor Trend and Allpar

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track loads.…

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity.

Grip is noticeably lowe…

Ford Finally Announces HP figure for 2020 GT500

Ford has been teasing the new GT500 for months now and many details are already known about it like specs and even top speed and downforce figures. But the one thing that remained a mystery is the exact horsepower figure. We knew it was going to be over 700 hp, but exactly how much wasn't known. But we FINALLY have an answer now in the form of a video. And what more appropriate way to announce a mad 700+ horsepower figure than a burnout video?


This figure puts it WELL above its primary rivals, namely the Challenger Hellcat with 707 hp and the Camaro ZL1 with 650 hp, but it is still shy of the new Hellcat Redeye with 797 hp, but it should be much lighter, to the tune of 200-300 lb. And while the Challenger Hellcat is a massively capable grand tourer for its size and weight, the GT500 should be in a different league on track, especially with the Track Pack.

Getting that much horsepower makes it the most powerful production Ford ever and the most power and torque dense V8 in the wor…

2014 BMW 335i xDrive M Sport Review

Post-refresh 2015 F30 3-series pictured. 
Which is better, an F30 3-series or an E46? The F30 has certainly taken its fair share of heat. But if you thought I was going to say the E46, you'd be dead wrong. The F30 3-series is better. Far better. It is quicker, faster, safer, more practical, more efficient, more refined, quieter.. the list goes on. A lot of reviews and people I talk to consider the F30 to be an abomination. Frankly, I don't see it. You'd have to be mad to think the E46 is better. Completely out to lunch. I don't know who in their right mind would prefer the E46..  Trouble is, since when were people buying sports cars in their right minds? Here, lies the real problem.

"Raw rather than refined in its noises, pounding ride, heavy clutch, 50 grand and cloth seats?"
".. and not at all shy about its performance compromises. It always acts like the automotive jock it is, every mile of every day."
"Raw and quite loud.. And sometimes ru…

2017 Honda Civic Type R Test - A Closer Look

FWD is for kids. Anyone can go fast in a FWD car. Real drivers learn to handle RWD. That's what a buddy said when I was talking about managing throttle in FWD vs RWD in one of the turns on our track. Another friend of mine who is a diehard VW fan just bought a new Mk7 Golf R. Naturally, we argued about Golf R vs Focus RS as we've done countless times in the past. This time, though, the Civic Type R came up, and he said it doesn't matter because "it's FWD." If you agree with all of that, you can't take this new Type R seriously. You might as well stop reading now and move on. And frankly, Honda has done a pretty good job with the styling to convince you NOT to take this car seriously.. But you might be making a mistake.

A proper, thoroughbred sports car needs to have RWD in my book. But we aren't talking about thoroughbreds here. We are talking about very-hot hatchbacks based on compact economy cars. So the question boils down to FWD or AWD? Well, wha…

Dad's Supercar - A great mid-engine build

I came across this home build on a forum (Cobaltss.net) and thought it was really cool. It's a mid-engine build with an engine out of a Cobalt SS (appears to be an LSJ) with a dry sump oiling system. The goal, according to the page, is to have 450 hp on gas to drive to the strip and switch to methanol, change injectors and tune and run with ~ 1,000 hp.






Rear suspension:


Front suspension:



Check it out the (little) details on the build here: Dad's Home-built mid-engine Supercar


Contact Me

Name

Email *

Message *