Skip to main content

The 2015 Ford Mustang is revealed!




The 2015 Mustang is finally here and it must be said, I'm pleasantly surprised (for the most part). The folks at Car and Driver were almost bang on with the final rendering that they posted a few weeks ago (2015 Mustang Leaked). This isn't a rendering though, this is the real thing straight from Ford.






Although I am not a fan of a few things, it is much better than I thought it would be. Considering all the talk about the Mustang going global and ditching traditional styling, I am very happy with the result. I think it looks absolutely fantastic. There's one problem, though, which is that it is unmistakably a Mustang only from most angles, not all. Looking at the picture below, if you remove the iconic pony from the wheel centre cap, it does not look like a Mustang. And it doesn't have to look retro to look like a Mustang because the rest of the car is very distinctly Mustang but looks very modern. From the front wheels back, it looks excellent; the profile, the roof, the rear end, the hips (yes, these are hips, not shoulders) and the stance are all done right. The front, however, not so much. The lights are too long and narrow. I think it would have looked much better if the headlights stopped at the edge of the front fascia while everything else remained unchanged. Nevertheless, the from end still looks striking and muscular.




The stance is improved by the new dimensions as the new car is lower and wider. Emphasized by the wide rear end, the rear track is a whole 3 inches wider than the current generation while the whole car is 1.5 inches wider at 188.3 inches. Other than that, there are few changes. Despite a lot of speculation that the 2015 Mustang will be smaller, it is essentially the same size. Overall length is 188.3 inches which is only 0.2 inches shorter than the current model but it sits 1.4 inches lower at 54.4 inches. Wheelbase is identical at 107.1 inches. This means that if the new car is lighter than the outgoing model, it will be through better chassis design and material selection, not shrinking in size.

Speaking of weight, there have been rumours of it being as much as 400 lb. lighter than the outgoing model. I couldn't find any information about the weight of the new model but I'm not holding my breath for 400 lb. Chevrolet cut almost 100 lb. off the chassis of the new C7 Corvette yet it is slightly heavier than the C6 Corvette due to added technologies and features and, unfortunately, I would expect the same to hold true for the Mustang.




Inside, the car will gain a tilting and telescoping steering wheel as opposed to the current tilting-only wheel, keyless entry, adaptive cruise control, push button start and a rev matching feature on manual transmission equipped models. Improved stability and traction control systems will also be available. If there's one improvement to the interior that the car needed the most, though, it would have to be the location of the cup holders. The cup holders were moved slightly to the right and the gear shifter moved to the left. Being a manual-equipped Mustang owner, I can say that this will be much appreciated. As was the case with previous models, Recaro seats are expected to come back as options.

The major change under the hood is the addition of the 2.3 litre 4 cylinder EcoBoost engine which is expected to be a mid-level engine that slots between the 3.7 litre V6 and 5.0-litre V8 which are expected to carry over with some upgrades. The V8 will gain hardware from the now-out-of-production Boss 302 such as the valve springs and connecting rods as well as an oil cooler. Expect power and torque numbers to be higher than the 420 hp and 390 lb-ft of torque of the current Coyote engine. Output of the V6 shouldn't change much to prevent the performance of the V6 from being too close to that of the EcoBoost engine.

Last but very certainly not least, the chassis. I have always felt that the solid rear axle gave the Mustang some sort of a charm - it was a flaw that every Mustang had to work with while battling with the world's top performance cars the same way the Porsche 911 always had its engine in the wrong place. Nevertheless, the new platform, S550, finally gives the Mustang an independent rear suspension which should improve both ride handling and I can't say that I'm not happy about that. The unfortunate part, though, is that this is probably going to be the best suspension and chassis to ever underpin a Mustang but it won't be perfect. The perfect Mustang, in my opinion, should look like the current generation (or even better, a 1967 fastback) and have the new S550 chassis, the 5.0 litre V8 Roadrunner engine and the transmission out of a GT500 but with the former Boss 302's gear ratios.

Since that Mustang will probably never be built, at least not by Ford, I am very happy with what we have here. I'm sure it will be excellent to drive and the updated look will bring more fans to the Mustang nameplate. Pricing has yet to be announced, but I expect the GT to go up in price, the V6 to start at close to the current price and the EcoBoost-equiped Mustang (SVO anyone?) to slot in between. Road tests for all three models can't come soon enough!


Popular posts from this blog

2020 Mid-engine Corvette C8 - What You Need to Know

Rumours of a mid-engine Corvette have been around basically since the C2 Corvette, the first Stingray. I've heard some people argue that the Corvette is already mid engine because the engine sits almost entirely behind the front axle, making it mounted midship. But everyone knows that the classic definition of a midengined car is that of an engine mounted between the seats and the rear axle, not the front axle. That's what everyone pictures if you say "mid-engine". Worse still (for the Corvette), a true midengined layout has a lot more traction - all else being equal - than a front-midship mounted engine like the current Corvette, no matter how far back it is mounted. Chevy knows this, and there has been no shortage of Corvette mid-engine concepts for decades. This time, however, it's different.

For one, manufacturers these days tend to keep very special/high performance models under wraps for a very long time during development, only revealing them when they a…

550 hp V8 Cadillac CT6 V Coming in 2019

Cadillac's largest car - the not-quite-a-flagship CT6 - is becoming a little more flagship-y by getting the full V treatment like you can get on the CTS and ATS (for just one more year before they're axed in anticipation of replacements, so grab them while you can). Cadillac calls the CT6 top-of-the-range but won't call it a flagship, clearly wanting to leave that distinction to a larger and/or more grandiose vehicle in the future. It was previously announced in March earlier this year to be getting a high dose of performance enhancements, the highlight of which is a new twin-turbo V8, and was going to join the line-up as Cadillac's skim-V models called V-sport. Think of it like M-performance packages from BMW vs full fledged M models, the only difference being V-sport models typically get unique (and much more powerful) engines. But just a couple of weeks ago, Cadillac announced that it will make it a full-fledged V line model, making the car inch a bit higher in pre…

2007 Saleen Mustang S281 SC Super Shaker Track Review

"Who's your green student today?" asked a friend and instructor at the BMW Club Atlantic Advanced Driver Training (HPDE) weekend in June this year. I said: "The Saleen." The response was: "Oh, boy." Mustangs, generally, have a reputation for being more power than chassis. Mustang drivers have quite the reputation for.. how to put this nicely? Taking advantage of said power/chassis imbalance. To make matters worse, this particular Mustang was a supercharged Saleen, with a honkin' Shaker scoop sticking out of its hood. Did I mention it was also a convertible? And the owner was someone who's never been on track before but clearly has the speed bug.

Having had a Mustang for years and driven a few on track, they don't scare me - generally speaking - but the combination of being convertible and supercharged with a new and excited owner worried me a little. Nevertheless, I shrugged it off and got excited about chatting with the owner to find out…

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track loads. Combine that with the fact that I drive a good amount on the street during the summer, and I was very worried that they wouldn't last more than a handful of…

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity.

Grip is noticeably lowe…

2014 BMW 335i xDrive M Sport Review

Post-refresh 2015 F30 3-series pictured. 
Which is better, an F30 3-series or an E46? The F30 has certainly taken its fair share of heat. But if you thought I was going to say the E46, you'd be dead wrong. The F30 3-series is better. Far better. It is quicker, faster, safer, more practical, more efficient, more refined, quieter.. the list goes on. A lot of reviews and people I talk to consider the F30 to be an abomination. Frankly, I don't see it. You'd have to be mad to think the E46 is better. Completely out to lunch. I don't know who in their right mind would prefer the E46..  Trouble is, since when were people buying sports cars in their right minds? Here, lies the real problem.

"Raw rather than refined in its noises, pounding ride, heavy clutch, 50 grand and cloth seats?"
".. and not at all shy about its performance compromises. It always acts like the automotive jock it is, every mile of every day."
"Raw and quite loud.. And sometimes ru…