Skip to main content

2016 Cadillac ATS Sedan 2.0T AWD - A Closer Look




The biggest news I found in this test is a huge improvement in power output. Looking back at one of the very early tests of the +Cadillac  ATS with this engine done by Car & Driver was a comparison test back in 2012, the ATS 2.0T was noticeably lacking in power compared to the 328i. Although the older tested cars were very different (i.e. lighter, manual equipped RWD versions) than this Cadillac, Car & Driver recently also tested a 2016 BMW 328i xDrive so we can have an apples-to-apples comparison of this AWD, 4-cyl turbo ATS and an AWD, 4-cyl turbo 328i. In the early test, the numbers were:


2013 Cadillac ATS 2.0T 2012 BMW 328i
0-30 mph 2.0 s 2.0 s
0-60 mph 6.3 s 5.6 s
0-100 mph 16.7 s 14.5 s
0-130 mph 34.7 s 26.4 s
1/4 mile 14.8 s @ 94 mph 14.3 s @ 99 mph
5-60 mph (street start) 7.4 s 6.6 s


At the time, the car made 272 hp @ 5,500 rpm and 260 lb-ft @ 1,700. Meanwhile, the 328i is rated at 240 hp @ 5,000 and 255 lb-ft @ 1,250 rpm. The BMW is largely unchanged with hp rating staying the same as well as rpms at which peak hp and torque, while the torque number inches up a few points to 258 lb-ft. The ATS, on the other hand, saw its torque output increase by 35 lb-ft from 260 to 295 lb-ft but the peak occurs 1,300 rpm later so the engine is now rated to make 272 hp @ 5,500 and 295 lb-ft @ 3,000. At first, it seems like the power moved later in the curve due to the late torque peak but I suspect that the updated engine makes well over the previous 260 lb-ft rating at the lower rpms and simply makes more as rpms climb.

The result? Nothing short of impressive. Before, the Cadillac trailed the BMW by almost 1 second (0.7 s) to 60, over two seconds (2.2 s) to 100 mph, and a whopping 8.3 seconds to 130 mph. Now, the Cadillac loses by only one tenth to the BMW to 60 mph but beats it to 100 mph by 0.3 s and to 130 mph by almost 1 second (0.8 s).


2016 Cadillac ATS4 2.0T (AWD) 2016 BMW 328i XDrive (AWD)
0-60 mph 5.4 s 5.3 s
0-100 mph 14.5 s 14.8 s
0-130 mph 28.2 s 29.0 s
1/4 mile 14.1 s @ 99 mph 14.0 s @ 97 mph
5-60 mph (street start) 6.3 s 6.4 s


Unfortunately, it’s hard to figure out exactly how close the two would be if tested in the same place and on the same day, beyond “bench racing” those (albeit, weather corrected) test numbers. With that said, the ATS 2.0T was always noticeably slower than the 328i in acceleration tests, regardless of testing outlet or weather. In other words, if these numbers show it to be that much closer, it’s probably pretty darn close.

What I found even more impressive, though, is the fact that the ATS tied the 328i in lateral grip, both posting 0.86 g, and was able to out-break it from 70 mph by 7 ft (167 ft vs 174 ft for the 328i), all while rolling on Grand Touring All-Season Michelin Primacy MXM4 ZP tires while the 328i had Max Performance Summer Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR tires.

Now, the Caddy isn’t without its shortcomings. It’s noticeably smaller in the back and has a smaller trunk. I think Cadillac actually hit the nail on the head with sizing, but that’s because my all-time favourite small RWD sedan of all time is the E46 BMW 3-series and the ATS is very close in size to it, except in length that is exaggerated by the styling. In fact, the ATS is closer in wheelbase to the E46 3-series while the new F10 3-series is closer to the E39 5-series. Unfortunately for Cadillac, most people are looking for bigger cars now, as evident in the SUV and crossover surge in sales, so perhaps BMW’s move to a larger 3-series is more of what the market wants.

Its other problem right now, and perhaps the biggest, is the badge, or lack thereof of a desirable one. Now, I know a lot of people would say that deciding against buying a car because of a badge is badge snobbery and that may be true as far as decision making but the fault ultimately falls on the manufacturer. The value of a badge isn’t built out of thin air and “badge snobs” buy the badge that has a good image. It’s built on years of offering an appealing product. The BMW badge has been found on great sports cars for years. Cadillac is still trying to establish itself in the segment.

With that said, I think that Cadillac has clearly demonstrated it can build a better sports car than BMW, and that’s not just my opinion. Most auto journalists place the ATS near or at the top of the class in terms of driving joy and the same stands true of the CTS. The CT6 hasn’t had a comprehensive review yet but it seems to also be focusing on the “sport” part of sport sedan, without compromising ride or comfort. Will that pay off, despite a small disadvantage in size compared to the competition? Only time will tell, but I think Cadillac is on the right path.

Popular posts from this blog

550 hp V8 Cadillac CT6 V Coming in 2019

Cadillac's largest car - the not-quite-a-flagship CT6 - is becoming a little more flagship-y by getting the full V treatment like you can get on the CTS and ATS (for just one more year before they're axed in anticipation of replacements, so grab them while you can). Cadillac calls the CT6 top-of-the-range but won't call it a flagship, clearly wanting to leave that distinction to a larger and/or more grandiose vehicle in the future. It was previously announced in March earlier this year to be getting a high dose of performance enhancements, the highlight of which is a new twin-turbo V8, and was going to join the line-up as Cadillac's skim-V models called V-sport. Think of it like M-performance packages from BMW vs full fledged M models, the only difference being V-sport models typically get unique (and much more powerful) engines. But just a couple of weeks ago, Cadillac announced that it will make it a full-fledged V line model, making the car inch a bit higher in pre…

2020 Mid-engine Corvette C8 - What You Need to Know

Rumours of a mid-engine Corvette have been around basically since the C2 Corvette, the first Stingray. I've heard some people argue that the Corvette is already mid engine because the engine sits almost entirely behind the front axle, making it mounted midship. But everyone knows that the classic definition of a midengined car is that of an engine mounted between the seats and the rear axle, not the front axle. That's what everyone pictures if you say "mid-engine". Worse still (for the Corvette), a true midengined layout has a lot more traction - all else being equal - than a front-midship mounted engine like the current Corvette, no matter how far back it is mounted. Chevy knows this, and there has been no shortage of Corvette mid-engine concepts for decades. This time, however, it's different.

For one, manufacturers these days tend to keep very special/high performance models under wraps for a very long time during development, only revealing them when they a…

2007 Saleen Mustang S281 SC Super Shaker Track Review

"Who's your green student today?" asked a friend and instructor at the BMW Club Atlantic Advanced Driver Training (HPDE) weekend in June this year. I said: "The Saleen." The response was: "Oh, boy." Mustangs, generally, have a reputation for being more power than chassis. Mustang drivers have quite the reputation for.. how to put this nicely? Taking advantage of said power/chassis imbalance. To make matters worse, this particular Mustang was a supercharged Saleen, with a honkin' Shaker scoop sticking out of its hood. Did I mention it was also a convertible? And the owner was someone who's never been on track before but clearly has the speed bug.

Having had a Mustang for years and driven a few on track, they don't scare me - generally speaking - but the combination of being convertible and supercharged with a new and excited owner worried me a little. Nevertheless, I shrugged it off and got excited about chatting with the owner to find out…

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track loads. Combine that with the fact that I drive a good amount on the street during the summer, and I was very worried that they wouldn't last more than a handful of…

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity.

Grip is noticeably lowe…

2014 BMW 335i xDrive M Sport Review

Post-refresh 2015 F30 3-series pictured. 
Which is better, an F30 3-series or an E46? The F30 has certainly taken its fair share of heat. But if you thought I was going to say the E46, you'd be dead wrong. The F30 3-series is better. Far better. It is quicker, faster, safer, more practical, more efficient, more refined, quieter.. the list goes on. A lot of reviews and people I talk to consider the F30 to be an abomination. Frankly, I don't see it. You'd have to be mad to think the E46 is better. Completely out to lunch. I don't know who in their right mind would prefer the E46..  Trouble is, since when were people buying sports cars in their right minds? Here, lies the real problem.

"Raw rather than refined in its noises, pounding ride, heavy clutch, 50 grand and cloth seats?"
".. and not at all shy about its performance compromises. It always acts like the automotive jock it is, every mile of every day."
"Raw and quite loud.. And sometimes ru…