Skip to main content

550 hp V8 Cadillac CT6 V Coming in 2019


Cadillac's largest car - the not-quite-a-flagship CT6 - is becoming a little more flagship-y by getting the full V treatment like you can get on the CTS and ATS (for just one more year before they're axed in anticipation of replacements, so grab them while you can). Cadillac calls the CT6 top-of-the-range but won't call it a flagship, clearly wanting to leave that distinction to a larger and/or more grandiose vehicle in the future. It was previously announced in March earlier this year to be getting a high dose of performance enhancements, the highlight of which is a new twin-turbo V8, and was going to join the line-up as Cadillac's skim-V models called V-sport. Think of it like M-performance packages from BMW vs full fledged M models, the only difference being V-sport models typically get unique (and much more powerful) engines. But just a couple of weeks ago, Cadillac announced that it will make it a full-fledged V line model, making the car inch a bit higher in prestige in the Cadillac lineup.


The heart of the upgrades is the new Cadillac twin-turbo V8 code named LT7. It's an all-new design, according to Cadillac, featuring dual overhead cams (DOHC) and hot-vee design. This marks the first time DOHC's were used on GM V8 engine since the Northstar design from the 90's. This one is known as Blackwing. You know it's better already than "Northstar" with a name like Blackwing. GM has long defended the OHV design benefits, which I am a big fan of. It's not clear whether it was a decision made simply to avoid the outdated stigma associated with OHV engine design that is unbefitting of a Cadillac going against the Germans, or GM simply wanted to tailor the engine more towards the benefits of a DOHC design, refinement likely being high on that list. Either way, it is back now and is backed by two turbos.

A hot-vee engine setup is not new. It is now used by Mercedes, BMW, and Audi, among others, but it is the first time being used by GM. Cadillac already has a number of twin-turbo V6 engines - the LF3 3.6 litre in the CTS Vsport, LF4 3.6 litre in the ATS V, and the LGW 3.0 litre that's already optional in the CT6. To minimize lag, all of them utilize shorter exhaust piping with turbos mounted just past a short exhaust manifold on either side of the engine and a patent-pending low-charge top-mounted intercooler. This will be the first time GM uses a hot-vee set up to minimize lag, where GM is mounting the turbos and the catalytic converters in the valley between the cylinder banks. As with GM's other V8's, this will be able to shut down cylinders under low load to save fuel.


The engine will displace 4.2 litres and feature a 90 deg V angle. Just like AMG, it will be hand-built. GM's Bowling Green plant in Kentucky, the same plant that nurtures various metals and plastics to turn into Corvettes, will take on the engine building duties. Each engine will come with a plaque stating it was hand built and who hand built it. The engine will feature forged crankshaft and rods, Mahle pistons, and cross-bolted main bearing caps. The turbos are Mitsubishi TD03 with titanium turbine wheels driving the compressor wheels to squeeze the intake charge up to 20 psi. The engine will also be available in non-V CT6's as an option with a lower state of tune and different intake/exhaust.

The result? Cadillac estimates 550 hp at 5,700 rpm and a very healthy 627 lb-ft of torque available from 3,200 rpm to 4,000 rpm. Seems like a bit of a narrow range at first but 90% of torque is available from as low as 2,000 rpm. There is also that tuned-down version of it estimated to be making 500 hp and 553 lb-ft from 2,600 rpm to 4,600 rpm so almost 90% of peak torque is available from 2,000 rpm to 4,600 rpm. GM also has a habit of publishing SAE dyno testing results and I wouldn't be surprised to see 80% of peak torque available from under 2,000 rpm to possibly over 5,000 rpm. Cadillac says it developed the engine with knowledge gained from GM's racing program. I think it should be a beast of an engine. Cadillac claims the engine is a little lighter and more compact than the LT4 in the Corvette Z06, CTS V, and Camaro ZL1. I suspect the weight saving compared to those OHV engines (usually lighter than DOHC) is mostly due to turbos being lighter and smaller than superchargers, as well as more efficient, thus generating less heat and needing smaller intercoolers.


The engine will be paired exclusively with a 10-speed automatic and all-wheel drive. The same 10-speed automatic that is used in trucks and - wait for it - is anticipated to find its way in the Camaro. I know what you're thinking.. all of a sudden, a twin turbo V8 Camaro, seems possible. And if early indicators are right about the upcoming mid-engine Corvette (details here about the mid engine Corvette), Tremec that is all too familiar with the Camaro will be supplying a 7-speed dual clutch transaxle/transmission (DCT) that fits this same engine to go in said Corvette. The same family of DCT's can be adapted to fit front engine cars and AWD, according to Tremec. That means that - theoretically - a twin-turbo DCT drivetrain (both AWD and RWD) is possible in both upcoming Cadillacs and Camaros... I digress

Of course, no Cadillac V line car is complete with just an engine transplant. The CT6 V gets stiffened suspension and retuned magnetic dampers - Magentic Ride Control in Cadillac speak. Curiously, the car will get a mechanical limited-slip differential unlike the CTS V, ATS V, as well higher Camaro and Corvette trims. All four corners will come with 4-piston fixed brembo calipers. No updates are provided on the wheels and tires but I expect Michelin Pilot Sport 4 or 4 S's and wheels will be 20". The car will also come with an active dual-mode exhaust, a feature that has proven very popular on Corvettes and Camaros. And, of course, now that it is a full V line model, it will come with a Track driving mode. In addition to the usual changes to the magnetic shocks and stability and traction control, Track Mode will also bias the AWD system to send more torque to the rear and take better advantage of the rear wheel steering you can get on lower spec CT6's.


The car will go on sale in spring 2019 so it's not too far ahead. It looks to be down a substantial 90 hp to the CTS V - Cadillac's current top dog - but I wouldn't be surprised if the final hp number is closer given that the 550 hp is an "estimate" and the engine likely makes more power under the curve than the LT4 in the CTS V. I suspect it will be massively capable and, although it will be a little heavier than the CTS V, the AWD should allow it to make far better use of what it has and will likely beat the CTS V in every measurable test. I wouldn't even be surprised if it beat the CTS V on track. Only time will tell. For now, it's good enough to just know that V8's are still alive and well at Cadillac.

Popular posts from this blog

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track loads. Combine that with the fact that I drive a good amount on the street during the summer, and I was very worried that they wouldn't last more than a handful of…

E46 Dinan S1 BMW M3 - Track Driven

A few years ago, I was still a student and I had a class called Internal Combustion Engines. It was easily one of my favourite classes, as you can image. Studying engines, calculating hp, torque, efficiency, and exhaust flow for grades? Sign me up! It wasn't just the content, though, as magnificent as it was. The class itself was taught by the coolest prof there is. You may think you've had a cool prof, teacher, coach, or instructor, but I've got the standard by which all educators must be measured.

For one, he or she has to teach something that is cool.. does it get cooler than Internal Combustion Engines? (No, in case you're wondering). This one is also a true gear head, so much so that he sticks around after class and argues about cars, performance, lap times, and racing. And occasionally does so in the middle of class.. For one class project, I proposed comparing the engines and specifications of the C6 Corvette ZR1 and the Ferrari 599, in an attempt to "reve…

2020 Porsche 992 (911) Details

Unlike the new 2019 3-series that was officially revealed by BMW, the anticipated 2020 Porsche 992 (911) has not been officially revealed yet. But that doesn't mean a lot about it isn't known already. In a recent prototype drive by Car and Driver, Porsche discussed a lot of the changes. This update is very important in my opinion because the next 911 may have its work cut out for it judging by what we know about the upcoming mid-engine Corvette. The 911 vs Corvette rivalry is nothing new, spanning decades. While there has been very significant and revolutionary changes to the 911 - including switching from air-cooled to water-cooled engines, losing hydraulic power steering, and recently an all turbocharged lineup (short of the GT3) - none have been as revolutionary as the Corvette's planned change to switch from front engine to mid engine layout. So what is the next 911 coming going to be armed with? There are a bunch of changes, although most are just incremental but one…

Michelin PSS vs Firestone Indy 500 - Track Review

A couple of weeks ago, I posted my first impressions of Michelin's PSS vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 tires. I've run PSS's for several years on the Boss, but I'm trying the Indy 500's for the first time. In short, I was worried about the narrower tires (I was running 285/35/18 PSS but could only find the Indy 500 in 275/35/18) and tread squirm, but I was happy with them up to that point just driving on the street. I had the chance to drive on them for three track days now. So what were they like? After my first session, they made an impression that basically persisted for the rest of track sessions on them. Phenomenal, unmatched value. Now, if value is something that stands out above all else, it typically means the compromise between qualities you want and those you don't is less than ideal, but the value is attractive. This is no different. I'll start with the bad, which really boil down to two: ultimate grip and grip longevity.

Grip is noticeably lowe…

2014 BMW 335i xDrive M Sport Review

Post-refresh 2015 F30 3-series pictured. 
Which is better, an F30 3-series or an E46? The F30 has certainly taken its fair share of heat. But if you thought I was going to say the E46, you'd be dead wrong. The F30 3-series is better. Far better. It is quicker, faster, safer, more practical, more efficient, more refined, quieter.. the list goes on. A lot of reviews and people I talk to consider the F30 to be an abomination. Frankly, I don't see it. You'd have to be mad to think the E46 is better. Completely out to lunch. I don't know who in their right mind would prefer the E46..  Trouble is, since when were people buying sports cars in their right minds? Here, lies the real problem.

"Raw rather than refined in its noises, pounding ride, heavy clutch, 50 grand and cloth seats?"
".. and not at all shy about its performance compromises. It always acts like the automotive jock it is, every mile of every day."
"Raw and quite loud.. And sometimes ru…

2016 BMW M4 Track Review

Imagine a world where only two cars exist and have ever existed; the BMW M4 and the Toyota Corolla. Assuming cost isn't a factor, just about every car buyer who has even a remote interest in high performance driving would take the M4. There would be no complaints about how it well goes, stops, or turns, how it handles, or even how it sounds. All those aspects are better in the M4; miles better, in fact. Next to a Corolla, an M4 is a super car, and a darn good one. But replace the Corolla with another car in this imaginary world, say a Lamborghini Huracan for an instance, and all of a sudden, an M4 becomes pedestrian. Perspective could make or break a car, even a good one. And that, perhaps, is the biggest contributing factor in the impression that the M4 left on me.

I haven't driven any Huracans, unfortunately. But on the same day I drove this BMW M4, I drove an E46 Dinan S1 M3 and a Cayman GT4. Comparisons to the GT4 in my mind were inevitable, but a bit unfair so I will lea…